jal0021 wrote:AMVs just aren't all that profitable of an endeavor, so no one will be able to make off like a bandit, no matter how hard they try.
once again, it's not how much money someone is making on the endeavor, it's the fact that they're making any money at all that makes it wrong.
jal0021 wrote:Second, while we're obviously violating copyright when we distribute AMVs, I don't buy into the idea that we're truly ripping any anime companies off - that is, adversely affecting their bottom line.
i'm having to repeat myself again. amvs are no "real" threat to the anime companies. that is, amvs are in no way going to take away from sales of their dvds. that's not the issue. if anime companies see that people are making money (however little) off of their licenses without their authorization, they will try to stop them. if it comes to court... if a company does not defend its copyright, it loses it. so they can't just "let it go."
jal0021 wrote:To be honest, if you're truly ripping anyone off, it's whoever holds the rights to the music you used, as it's there uncut and in its entirety (most of the time).
although they generally have bigger fish to fry, that is a concern.
jal0021 wrote:As long as fansubbers are safe, I think we can relax.
fansubbers get cease-and-desist orders all the time.
earthcurrent: i don't know about you, but i could theoretically see the vast shelves of domestically available anime at any time. i think it's really nice to go to a con and be able to see something that i can't see anyplace else.
iserlohn: i don't really know how that's supposed to be a defense. if i was producing things legally or illegally, i don't think i'd charge friends for my product. i also don't remember seeing any fansubs on otakon's video schedules for the past few years, though i could have easily just missed them. or they were last minute schedule changes, and thus were not part of the official schedule anyway.