Harsh critic, helpfull advice.

storyteller · Post by **storyteller** » Thu Sep 16, 2004 6:37 pm

iranai,

Thank you for the review.

genestarwind21122 · Post by **genestarwind21122** » Thu Sep 16, 2004 7:21 pm

I would like a good review for Belldandy's Memories. Thanks.

Gene Starwind 21122

Here's the linkage:

http://www.animemusicvideos.org/members ... hp?v=36086

Brolly345 · Post by **Brolly345** » Thu Sep 16, 2004 10:20 pm

This could use another review:

http://www.animemusicvideos.org/members ... hp?v=46635

Thanks in advance.

bob790 · Post by **bob790** » Fri Sep 17, 2004 2:58 am

iranai,

Thank you for the review.

iranai · Post by **iranai** » Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:58 am

done through brolly.

I had to give out my first 'bad' review in this thread, and sadly, the amv in and of itself didn't deserve the score it got >_>. It was a technical problem, not an artistic one..

even so, i haent disliked anything i've seen yet ^_^

Maverick-Rubik · Post by **Maverick-Rubik** » Fri Sep 17, 2004 5:30 am

hey iranai, can I get some feedback on this one?

http://www.animemusicvideos.org/members ... hp?v=48660

Thanks in advance.

iranai · Post by **iranai** » Fri Sep 17, 2004 7:50 am

Maverick: your OP is up.

<-- goes back to hide

Brolly345 · Post by **Brolly345** » Fri Sep 17, 2004 1:17 pm

iranai wrote:I had to give out my first 'bad' review in this thread, and sadly, the amv in and of itself didn't deserve the score it got >_>. It was a technical problem, not an artistic one...

Just curious. Do you mean my AMV? And if so what technical problem are you talking about you didn't mention it in you op. O_o

One more question: Have you downloaded my video before? Your the first to notice I downgraded to the lower resolution. Unless you meant from 720x480...

iranai · Post by **iranai** » Fri Sep 17, 2004 5:35 pm

Brolly345 wrote:
iranai wrote:Do you mean my AMV?
When I say technical, i'm refering to things done before and after the editing proccess.

One more question: Have you downloaded my video before? Your the first to notice I downgraded to the lower resolution. Unless you meant from 720x480...

512x384 is a non-standard resolution. neither raws, fansubs, captures, or dvd's come in this resolution... anymore.

3 years or so back. 512x384 was a very common fansub resoluion, for the exact same reason, to save filesize.( ahh the days of 120 meg encodes ).
It uses about 1/2 the video information.. but doesn't noticably look smaller.

I will not bash any coice of resoluion chosen to save filesize, ( although i'm dubious of 320x240 and below ) as long as the filesize accuretly reflects the video quality ( in ohterwords, if it's a 15 meg encode, i expet it to look like a 15 meg encode. )

What I have problems with are people who present low quality video with a huge filesize. ( ie, 320x240 resoluioin, 60 meg + filesize )

kain2983 · Post by **kain2983** » Fri Sep 17, 2004 11:50 pm

hey thanks for that op could you do the other one in my sig too.
If you have time
thanks