why are you using an unstable codec?
- Otohiko
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 8:32 pm
Hm. Sounds odd anyway.
I guess it's one of those things where two people of opposite experiences come together and can't possibly agree since their experience, which they know to be true, is completely opposite of each other's.
Perhaps we could just ask the peanut gallery? Who else has problems with the beast?
I guess it's one of those things where two people of opposite experiences come together and can't possibly agree since their experience, which they know to be true, is completely opposite of each other's.
Perhaps we could just ask the peanut gallery? Who else has problems with the beast?
The Birds are using humanity in order to throw something terrifying at this green pig. And then what happens to us all later, that’s simply not important to them…
- Corran
- Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 7:40 pm
- Contact:
Did that VLC player that Orwell posted earlier work for you?
If not could you try running this test for us?
http://www.memtest86.com/
Use the zipped files to create a bootable floppy. Upon system startup the floppy will launch a programm in dos that will test your ram. Let it run for at least an hour or two. Let us know if it finds any errors.
If not could you try running this test for us?
http://www.memtest86.com/
Use the zipped files to create a bootable floppy. Upon system startup the floppy will launch a programm in dos that will test your ram. Let it run for at least an hour or two. Let us know if it finds any errors.
- Corran
- Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 7:40 pm
- Contact:
Nevermind, I didn't see the post earlier that it was working for you.
If it works in VLC then the issue seems to be in clashing codecs. Number one reason I don't use codec packs now.
VLC is completely selfcontained meaning it doesn't require the codecs to be installed on you system. Since VLC works that is why we can come to this conclusion.
If it works in VLC then the issue seems to be in clashing codecs. Number one reason I don't use codec packs now.
VLC is completely selfcontained meaning it doesn't require the codecs to be installed on you system. Since VLC works that is why we can come to this conclusion.
- aoi_neko
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:35 am
- Location: Upstate, NY
- Contact:
Just to nitpick here, first let me point out that if a codec crashes or freezes the system, it's never really the codec's fault. The worst a codec ever SHOULD be able to do is to crash the player. If the operating system allows a process gone bad to crash the whole computer, it's a flaw in the operating system. The worst you should ever see is "Process <foo> attempted an illegal operation and is being terminated," or something like it. But we ARE talking about Windows here, and yeah, Windows has some problems in that regard. Windows Media Player especially has problems in that regard, because, like the browser, MS has tried to make it as indivisible a part of the OS as possible. So,if you're using WMP it reallly doesn't shock me all that much that a failure in that drags the system down with it.
People are blaming your computer because when dozens of computers with a wide variety of OS levels and graphics cards all run divx without problems, and yours does not, the codec itself seems like an unlikely cause. That seems even more likely if something besides WMP plays it without problems.
To directly answer the question in the topic, people don't generally use a codec that THEY think is unstable. The assumption is you've got some sort of software conflict so that when you try and play a divx video, something happens on your machine that doesn't happen on ours.
Is the 4CC of the problem files actually DIVX? Or are they something else like DIV3, DIV4, XVID or MPG4? Have you installed anything like avicodec or gspot to see what exactly is handling that specific 4cc??
People are blaming your computer because when dozens of computers with a wide variety of OS levels and graphics cards all run divx without problems, and yours does not, the codec itself seems like an unlikely cause. That seems even more likely if something besides WMP plays it without problems.
To directly answer the question in the topic, people don't generally use a codec that THEY think is unstable. The assumption is you've got some sort of software conflict so that when you try and play a divx video, something happens on your machine that doesn't happen on ours.
Is the 4CC of the problem files actually DIVX? Or are they something else like DIV3, DIV4, XVID or MPG4? Have you installed anything like avicodec or gspot to see what exactly is handling that specific 4cc??
<i>"Tamago no kara wo yabureneba hinatori wa umarezu ni shin de yuku. Warewa ga hina da. Tamago wa sekai da. Sekai no kara wo yaburaneba warera wa umarezu ni shin de yuku. Sekai no kara wo hakai se yo. Sekai wo kakumei suru tame ni!"</i>
- staces
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 12:53 pm
- Location: California
- Contact:
I agree with nearly everyone above, it's an issue within your computer not the codec or even Windows itself. I'm an XP user as well, and I've never had a problem with it, likewise it worked fine back in the day with Windows ME and Windows 98.
My advice to you. learn to build your computer properly or buy a new one. Also, leaving bad opinions for an AMV due to a program within your computer is immature. Try e-mailing the creators and inform them of the issue first or see if they could (if they were feeling generous) put up a copy done with a different codec.
My advice to you. learn to build your computer properly or buy a new one. Also, leaving bad opinions for an AMV due to a program within your computer is immature. Try e-mailing the creators and inform them of the issue first or see if they could (if they were feeling generous) put up a copy done with a different codec.
- devilmaykickass
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 8:47 pm
Reviewing videos you can see with low scores just because you have a problem with YOUR SYSTEM that you can't seem to resolve + openingly admitting that you were trying to "remaster" other peoples' videos in WMM into WMV format + coming onto a forum and bitching about all of the above on top of the actual acts = you fucking fail at life.
There's nothing wrong with Divx.
There's nothing wrong with Divx.
- bum
- 17747114553
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2003 9:56 pm
- JudgeHolden
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 8:49 am
- Status: Looking at you through your window!
- Location: The great white north (Minneapolis)
Ah, young Skywalker. Walk away from the darkside! Bill gates is not your friend!BasharOfTheAges wrote:Except for compatibility and expansion within a reasonable budget.. but who needs that?JudgeHolden wrote:Get a mac and all your problems will be solved.
Anway, I have no problems with compatibilty. But, then of course I'm not a gamer. Also, once you get a good Mac, you shouldn't need to upgrade nearly as fast. Plus when I buy new things for it, I don't have to worry about systems comflicting or drivers.
- CerebralAssamite
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 9:56 am
- Location: You Mean You Care?
- bum
- 17747114553
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2003 9:56 pm